QUESTION 91: OF TAKING THE DIVINE NAME FOR THE PURPOSE OF INVOKING IT BY MEANS OF PRAISE
We must now consider the taking of the Divine name for the purpose of
invoking it by prayer or praise. Of prayer we have already spoken (Question 
). Wherefore we must speak now of praise. Under this head there are two
points of inquiry:
(1) Whether God should be praised with the lips?
(2) Whether God should be praised with song?
Article 1: Whether God should be praised with the lips?
Objection 1: It would seem that God should not be praised with the lips. The
Philosopher says (Ethic. 1,12): "The best of men ere accorded not praise,
but something greater." But God transcends the very best of all things.
Therefore God ought to be given, not praise, but something greater than
praise: wherefore He is said (Ecclus. 43:33) to be "above all praise."
Objection 2: Further, divine praise is part of divine worship, for it is an
act of religion. Now God is worshiped with the mind rather than with the
lips: wherefore our Lord quoted against certain ones the words of Is.
29:13, "This people . . . honors [Vulg.: 'glorifies'] Me with their lips,
but their heart is far from Me." Therefore the praise of God lies in the
heart rather than on the lips.
Objection 3: Further, men are praised with the lips that they may be
encouraged to do better: since just as being praised makes the wicked
proud, so does it incite the good to better things. Wherefore it is
written (Prov. 27:21): "As silver is tried in the fining-pot . . . so a
man is tried by the mouth of him that praiseth." But God is not incited
to better things by man's words, both because He is unchangeable, and
because He is supremely good, and it is not possible for Him to grow
better. Therefore God should not be praised with the lips.
On the contrary, It is written (Ps. 62:6): "My mouth shall praise Thee
with joyful lips."
I answer that, We use words, in speaking to God, for one reason, and in
speaking to man, for another reason. For when speaking to man we use
words in order to tell him our thoughts which are unknown to him.
Wherefore we praise a man with our lips, in order that he or others may
learn that we have a good opinion of him: so that in consequence we may
incite him to yet better things; and that we may induce others, who hear
him praised, to think well of him, to reverence him, and to imitate him.
On the other hand we employ words, in speaking to God, not indeed to make
known our thoughts to Him Who is the searcher of hearts, but that we may
bring ourselves and our hearers to reverence Him.
Consequently we need to praise God with our lips, not indeed for His sake, but for our own sake; since by praising Him our devotion is aroused towards Him, according to Ps. 49:23: "The sacrifice of praise shall glorify Me, and there is the way by which I will show him the salvation of God." And forasmuch as man, by praising God, ascends in his affections to God, by so much is he withdrawn from things opposed to God, according to Is. 48:9, "For My praise I will bridle thee lest thou shouldst perish." The praise of the lips is also profitable to others by inciting their affections towards God, wherefore it is written (Ps. 33:2): "His praise shall always be in my mouth," and farther on: "Let the meek hear and rejoice. O magnify the Lord with me."
Reply to Objection 1: We may speak of God in two ways. First, with regard to His
essence; and thus, since He is incomprehensible and ineffable, He is
above all praise. In this respect we owe Him reverence and the honor of
latria; wherefore Ps. 64:2 is rendered by Jerome in his Psalter
[*Translated from the Hebrew]: "Praise to Thee is speechless, O God," as
regards the first, and as to the second, "A vow shall be paid to Thee."
Secondly, we may speak of God as to His effects which are ordained for
our good. In this respect we owe Him praise; wherefore it is written (Is. 63:7): "I will remember the tender mercies of the Lord, the praise of the
Lord for all the things that the Lord hath bestowed upon us." Again,
Dionysius says (Div. Nom. 1): "Thou wilt find that all the sacred hymns,"
i.e. divine praises "of the sacred writers, are directed respectively to
the Blessed Processions of the Thearchy," i.e. of the Godhead, "showing
forth and praising the names of God."
Reply to Objection 2: It profits one nothing to praise with the lips if one
praise not with the heart. For the heart speaks God's praises when it
fervently recalls "the glorious things of His works" [*Cf. Ecclus.
17:7,8]. Yet the outward praise of the lips avails to arouse the inward
fervor of those who praise, and to incite others to praise God, as stated
Reply to Objection 3: We praise God, not for His benefit, but for ours as stated.
Article 2: Whether God should be praised with song?
Objection 1: It would seem that God should not be praised with song. For the
Apostle says (Col. 3:16): "Teaching and admonishing one another in
psalms, hymns and spiritual canticles." Now we should employ nothing in
the divine worship, save what is delivered to us on the authority of
Scripture. Therefore it would seem that, in praising God, we should
employ, not corporal but spiritual canticles.
Objection 2: Further, Jerome in his commentary on Eph. 5:19, "Singing and
making melody in your hearts to the Lord," says: "Listen, young men whose
duty it is to recite the office in church: God is to be sung not with the
voice but with the heart. Nor should you, like play-actors, ease your
throat and jaws with medicaments, and make the church resound with
theatrical measures and airs." Therefore God should not be praised with
Objection 3: Further, the praise of God is competent to little and great, according to Apoc. 14, "Give praise to our God, all ye His servants; and you that fear Him, little and great." But the great, who are in the church, ought not to sing: for Gregory says (Regist. iv, ep. 44): "I hereby ordain that in this See the ministers of the sacred altar must not sing" (Cf. Decret., dist. xcii., cap. In sancta Romana Ecclesia). Therefore singing is unsuitable to the divine praises.
Objection 4: Further, in the Old Law God was praised with musical instruments
and human song, according to Ps. 32:2,3: "Give praise to the Lord on the
harp, sing to Him with the psaltery, the instrument of ten strings. Sing
to Him a new canticle." But the Church does not make use of musical
instruments such as harps and psalteries, in the divine praises, for fear
of seeming to imitate the Jews. Therefore in like manner neither should
song be used in the divine praises.
Objection 5: Further, the praise of the heart is more important than the
praise of the lips. But the praise of the heart is hindered by singing,
both because the attention of the singers is distracted from the
consideration of what they are singing, so long as they give all their
attention to the chant, and because others are less able to understand
the thing that are sung than if they were recited without chant.
Therefore chants should not be employed in the divine praises.
On the contrary, Blessed Ambrose established singing in the Church of
Milan, a Augustine relates (Confess. ix).
I answer that, As stated above (Article ), the praise of the voice is
necessary in order to arouse man's devotion towards God. Wherefore
whatever is useful in conducing to this result is becomingly adopted in
the divine praises. Now it is evident that the human soul is moved in
various ways according to various melodies of sound, as the Philosopher
state (Polit. viii, 5), and also Boethius (De Musica, prologue). Hence
the use of music in the divine praises is a salutary institution, that
the souls of the faint-hearted may be the more incited to devotion.
Wherefore Augustine say (Confess. x, 33): "I am inclined to approve of
the usage of singing in the church, that so by the delight of the ears
the faint-hearted may rise to the feeling of devotion": and he says of
himself (Confess. ix, 6): "I wept in Thy hymns and canticles, touched to
the quick by the voices of Thy sweet-attuned Church."
Reply to Objection 1: The name of spiritual canticle may be given not only to
those that are sung inwardly in spirit, but also to those that are sung
outwardly with the lips, inasmuch as such like canticles arouse spiritual
Reply to Objection 2: Jerome does not absolutely condemn singing, but reproves
those who sing theatrically in church not in order to arouse devotion,
but in order to show off, or to provoke pleasure. Hence Augustine says
(Confess. x, 33): "When it befalls me to be more moved by the voice than
by the words sung, I confess to have sinned penally, and then had rather
not hear the singer."
Reply to Objection 3: To arouse men to devotion by teaching and preaching is a
more excellent way than by singing. Wherefore deacons and prelates, whom
it becomes to incite men's minds towards God by means of preaching and
teaching, ought not to be instant in singing, lest thereby they be
withdrawn from greater things. Hence Gregory says (Regist. iv, ep. 44):
"It is a most discreditable custom for those who have been raised to the
diaconate to serve as choristers, for it behooves them to give their
whole time to the duty of preaching and to taking charge of the alms."
Reply to Objection 4: As the Philosopher says (Polit. viii, 6), "Teaching should
not be accompanied with a flute or any artificial instrument such as the
harp or anything else of this kind: but only with such things as make
good hearers." For such like musical instruments move the soul to
pleasure rather than create a good disposition within it. In the Old
Testament instruments of this description were employed, both because the
people were more coarse and carnal---so that they needed to be aroused by
such instruments as also by earthly promises---and because these material
instruments were figures of something else.
Reply to Objection 5: The soul is distracted from that which is sung by a chant
that is employed for the purpose of giving pleasure. But if the singer
chant for the sake of devotion, he pays more attention to what he says,
both because he lingers more thereon, and because, as Augustine remarks
(Confess. x, 33), "each affection of our spirit, according to its
variety, has its own appropriate measure in the voice, and singing, by
some hidden correspondence wherewith it is stirred." The same applies to
the hearers, for even if some of them understand not what is sung, yet
they understand why it is sung, namely, for God's glory: and this is
enough to arouse their devotion.